On 4 June 2010 00:20, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > Hmm, on second thought, maybe that's not such a hot idea. There might be > two different stores which are combined into one, and obviously we'd want to > keep both uuids (otherwise they wouldn't be "permanent").
David Dean has suggested Flickr would probably be more interested in building UUIDs than tenants, so this is as good a reason as any to automatically allocate multiple UUIDs based on what the object is tagged with when a UUID is requested. I've also incorporated most of your previous emails suggestions into the wiki page, it might be useful to get a comment from Flickr or Wikipedia about our current thinking, since they are the ones most likely to benefit from this. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk