On 4 June 2010 00:20, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, on second thought, maybe that's not such a hot idea. There might be > two different stores which are combined into one, and obviously we'd want to > keep both uuids (otherwise they wouldn't be "permanent").
This may require multiple relations against a single node or area otherwise you won't know which uuid would apply to which store. > Still, I'd prefer uuid=1;2;3 to uuid:*=*. The benefit of sub-tagging instead of tag stuffing is it is more efficient for things to parse. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
