Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk
<mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk>> wrote:
Ed Avis wrote:
Isn't this tagging redundant? If a link road leads from a
primary to a
secondary, or whatever, this can be seen by looking at the tags
for the two
roads it connects. In principle there is no need to duplicate
the information.
But how do you know that a way IS a slip from one road to another,
and not just another road?
You could always have highway=link.
But some links ARE motorway rules and some ARE trunk road so just saying link
does not work.
But IMO, it's not a big enough deal to bother changing.
There is a lot of good detail already mapped that does not need changing. Just
using as it was intended.
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
