That's really for the LWG to answer... On Jul 19, 2010, at 8:55 PM, Peteris Krisjanis wrote: > 2010/7/19 SteveC <[email protected]>: > >> Can you restate the question as I don't have mail archives etc here (on my >> phone) > > Ok, there it goes: I suggest to add SA clause and Attribution clause > as requirement for any new open and free license in CT point 3. It > would help to ease problems with big data contributors which could > agree with ODBL (as it still have SA and Attribution), but are uneasy > about clarification of point 3 in CT. > > Already thanks for answer, > cheers, > Peter. >
Steve stevecoast.com _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
