80n
It was not my intention to imply CC-BY-SA is compatible with ODbL. I did not
really want to get into a discussion about ODbL, but to concentrate solely on
the CT's.
My intention was simply to draw attention to the fact that agreeing to the CT
terms was not as simple as might have been suggested by the text on the sign up
page which appeared yesterday, with no warning that there might be issue if you
had used some of the more common sources of data currently employed by OSM
mappers.
David
----- Original Message -----
From: 80n
To: David Groom
Cc: Cartinus ; talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Voluntary re-licensing begins
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:47 PM, David Groom <revi...@pacific-rim.net> wrote:
b) Ignoring the Yahoo data, but taking any data that may have had a PD or
CC-BY-SA clause that has be used in import, since these are general permissions
given and they do not explicitly mention granting rights to use in OSM, I cant
possible agree that I have EXPLICIT permission to use them. I have permission
by virtue of they are PD or CC-BY-SA, but not EXPLICIT permission to do so.
David, I don't think that CC-BY-SA is compatible with ODbL, nor with the
Contributor Terms. If you have added content that is licensed under CC-BY-SA
you cannot agree to the Contrbutor Terms.
I'm sure you know that but your statement above suggests that CC-BY-SA is
compatible with OBdL and CT. It is not.
80n
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
