On 19/08/2010 9:58 PM, Chris Browet wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 13:29, Pierre-Alain Dorange <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Chris Browet <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I've seen often that the reply to this argument is that we must
trust OSMF,
> that it will make sure OSM is under good care.
> Honestly, in this world, who would trust a foundation whose
members he
> doesn't know personally? Even if he would, what about future
members?
No one can know, but there is limitations in the Licence and CT. OSMF
can change licence to a free and open one not a closed one it can't be
done.
They definitely need to define that, it would help. "an OSI endorsed
free and open license", maybe...
- Chris -
Then you'd be trusting OSI rather than OSMF.
Brendan
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
