It is not only about NearMap, we have tens of goverment sources which requires attribution.
It *is* talk list issue. It is about future of the project. Cheers, Peter. 2010/8/19 Brad Neuhauser <[email protected]>: > If it's about NearMap, then talk-au seems more appropriate. > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> wrote: >>> this discussion must move to legal-talk. >> >> If we don't change the contributor terms, then we lose NearMap. >> >> That's not a legal discussion. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > -- mortigi tempo Pēteris Krišjānis _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
