On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:34 PM, andrzej zaborowski <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 30 August 2010 12:11, Chris Browet <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:02, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> cc-by-sa (and almost? every viral license) allows for forking as long as > >> said fork is under the same license. Note the number of Wikipedia forks > >> and > >> mirrors: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks > >> > > Ok, thanks. And it would still be possible under ODbL, would it? > > ODbL is share-alike too, so yes. That is not true as 80n has shown. It's an anti-thetan license with pseudo GPL clauses and is Racist against Australians. > And I started to think some time > ago, that such a fork will make a lot of sense considering the > facebook-style Contributor Terms osmf wants people to agree to. It > would be a place for all the people that want share-alike and all > those that use sources that want share-alike, like those tracing from > Nearmap and a number of import sources, one of which I have used. The > OSMF would be able to include all this data in their planet snapshots > and make accessible through OSM API, and it wouldn't diverge from the > main database. > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
