On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:05:59PM +1000, John Smith wrote: > On 31 August 2010 06:51, Jane Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > That is not true as 80n has shown. It's an anti-thetan license with pseudo > > GPL clauses and is Racist against Australians. > > While some love to keep confusing the issue and keep saying that most > speaking out are against the ODBL, this isn't completely untrue and > they know it, the majority of problems lie with the the new > Contributor Terms...
Its about the new complexity - I am not against ODBL+CT + whatever per se. It might be the better solution - although its much more complex as we see - I would like the new license to be much simpler than before and i am willing to pay to "price" of Share-Alikeness and other "protecting" elements. I'd rather say - make it PD and lets continue mapping - Its not about licenses but rather about community. I'll not relicense as it stands today as thats the only time i am beeing asked about relicensing and the license - so the only choice i have is to refuse relicensing now ... Flo 1) Not that i believe in Share-Alike or believe in OSMF suing someone for abusing - neither does it make sense ... -- Florian Lohoff [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
