Am 31.08.2010 10:35, schrieb Florian Lohoff: > Its about the new complexity - I am not against ODBL+CT + whatever per se. > It might be the better solution - although its much more complex as we > see - I would like the new license to be much simpler than before and i am > willing to pay to "price" of Share-Alikeness and other "protecting" elements.
I agree, but... > I'd rather say - make it PD and lets continue mapping - Its not about > licenses but rather about community. I very much agree. > I'll not relicense as it stands today as thats the only time i am beeing > asked about relicensing and the license - so the only choice i have > is to refuse relicensing now ... ... I rather accept the new license, assuming the lawyers and the LWG know what they're doing. Besides the CT open a way to PD, which is also incentive to accept them. (And a source of problems where incompatible imports happened). -- Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie Bremen - 53.0901°N 8.7868°E Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
