* Greg Troxel <[email protected]> [2011-01-03 22:19 -0500]: > Richard Welty <[email protected]> writes: > > this is why i suggested adding a "centroid" tag to the boundary relations > > as a way to convey the place that is by convention considered the > > "center" of town. > > The word centroid seems best avoided. It has a well established > geometrical meaning and that isn't what we mean. admin_centre seems > fine for boundaries with admin_level tags. Or just traditional_center > for any boundary relation.
The boundary relation[0] has roles for both admin_centre and label, though I don't know how many renderers are using them currently. For some reason, a lot of places (including the US) seem to have standardized on using multipolygons instead of boundary relations for administrative boundaries. I'm still not sure why, since the boundary relation seems to me to be a better fit for the data. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis ---- --- -- _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
