2011/1/29 Serge Wroclawski <[email protected]>:
> add" the users were mentioning was in WikiCommons. WikiCommons is
> their repository of usable content that's not directly in Wikipedia.
> It's images, original documents, etc.
>
> I thought "Why don't we have that? We can store images of places,
> licensed maps, etc."  And if we don't, I'm sure we could work with
> them (WikiMedia) to do it for us and work collaboratively.


Here I'm with you. If those Images were stored centrally and hosted by
OSM or the wikimedia foundation I see a much better chance of not
having a big image-link-cemetery in the database.

cheers,
Martin

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to