I would like to suggest the continuation of dual-licensing under CC-BY-SA in addition to ODbL. Then, anyone who is currently making use of OSM will be able to continue doing so with no legal worries. There would then be a choice of two ways to use the OSM map data:
- old-style share-alike: your final result must be distributed under CC-BY-SA (which is fine for many in the existing OSM community, but not attractive to many commercial users) - new-style 'produced work' under ODbL: you don't have to distribute the final work under any particular licence, but you must share the derived database and tools needed. -- Ed Avis <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
