On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Pieren <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Serge Wroclawski <[email protected]> wrote: >> The problem here is that without "another side" there can be no "consensus".
> You are saying that the opinion of one contributor > doing 1000 edits is more important than the opinion of 1000 > contributors doing 1 edit. Please don't speak for me. I said that if one person is editing and the other isn't, then the we need to listen to the active contributors. Furthermore, I said that you can't get consensus from idle accounts. > I like David's idea with the specific tag "name:disputed". The status of Jerusalem as part of Israel is not disputed. Its status as a Palestinian city is, The fact that some people don't like the situation doesn't change that. A "disputed" tag will result in many things being marked disputed. I can think of a bunch even in the US. - Serge _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
