Hello, Fine. So you are saying that the email you sent to Thomas was out of kindness not out of petty goals? Also you are not answering my points in the first place. I find you pretty disingenuous at time and while I do respect the other projects out there, you are not helping them in any way. As I said, I am fast reaching a point where I am actually reviewing my legal choice to get the data I contributed to REMOVED from FOSM as a statement and even considering some lawyer to actually get it done. The only reason why I have not done so, so far, is not to appear like a complete jerk. I am actually considering this more and more as it would be the perfect way to test whether CC-By-SA is indeed capable of protecting facts in the first place. I can assure you that the likelihood of that is going to be very slim based in a court in France. This is however something not constructive in the first place. More seriously, as I have said, I have no trouble with data being removed as it is part of the life of such a project and to make sure that we are clean in terms of "potential" copyrights (I am not convinced that facts can retain copyrights in the first place on facts, especially after talking to so many legal people over the past 3 years). I think your point has been made numerous time and I am pretty convinced it will be honoured. That said, I will be more than happy to discuss that discussion offline if you so desire, but I have no intention to continue replying bitterly to all posts afterwards.
Emilie Laffray On 29 May 2012 11:48, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen < g.grem...@cetest.nl> wrote: > Emilie,**** > > ** ** > > I defend 2 legal interests:**** > > ** ** > > Mine : I invested time work and money, that I co-licensed under CC-by-SA > to the previous OSM**** > > OSM: by keeping the OSM database clean of tainted data**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > If you call that trolling ……**** > > Sometimes I think that people are called trolls because they defend**** > > statements other do not agree with.**** > > ** ** > > Sorry Emilie, it’s a pity if that creates some loss of data,**** > > but you should take it like a man, and accept the consequences**** > > of the route OSM took. Put the liability on those who are**** > > responsible for that !**** > > ** ** > > Gert**** > > ** ** > > ** >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk