On 13 August 2012 18:05, john whelan <[email protected]> wrote: > Do we need to consider the ways that have been derived from GPS tracks that > were licensed CC-by-SA and tag values such as road names where the original > has been replaced but tag information has been copied over for our consumers > to be reassured the data is .ODBL clean? >
John, please at least have the integrity to say that this is an issue raised on the FOSM fork forum, of which you are an active member. On Peter Millar's (sherbourne) claim raised on the FOSM forum, I have removed the data and remapped. Peter Millar is welcome to remove the GPS traces (as per a LWG email to him a few weeks ago), the data working group is also happy to do this on his behalf if notified. OSM as an online service provider will act accordingly on copyright takedowns. The OSMF has a register copyright agent, otherwise copyright owners are welcome to email the OSMF's Licensing Working Group or Data working group with specific cases. On a personal note: I find it offensive that FOSM members continue to use OpenStreetMap resources for FOSM mapping, while taking an aggressive attitude against OpenStreetMap. I spent many hours of sweat and creativity work setting up unique services like OSM's EPSG:3857 OSSV tile server, the new OS1 tile server, AGRI, Surrey Aerial Imagery (ODbL Licensed) servers etc. It would be better if we got along. Regards Grant _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
