On 16 August 2012 10:34, Simon Poole <[email protected]> wrote: > The LWG meets once per week and, you wouldn't believe it, in general has > its minutes online shortly afterwards. > > Our take on the change over is here: > https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1j4wiDqukbRGNDh9kC-cUL6j3t4NhlcVgancqieHywK0 > > Work has been progressing on the open issue listen in item 6, some are > done some are still open.
Thanks, though I'd already seen that. (The promptness of the LWG's minutes is great by the way :) ) However, while the details in those minutes do provide some useful insight into what is still to be done, they don't really provide any indication of time scales. There's also no mention of the progress (or lack thereof) in the following week's LWG minutes, so one doesn't get any sense of how things are progressing. The LWG minutes also don't explain whether OSMF is actually planning to make the license change as soon as those issues are resolved or whether there are also other things that need to be done first. In the run-up to the redaction process, we had weekly updates posted to the rebuild mailing list from the Communication Working Group. Perhaps something similar could be continued now. Or maybe we could have another official post on http://blog.osmfoundation.org/ to provide an update as to where things currently stand... Robert. -- Robert Whittaker _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
