What about “with OSM” instead of “by OSM”?

-mike.

---------------------------------------
michal migurski http://mike.teczno.com

On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:39 AM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote:

> 
> The copyright page is now much better than before and IMHO contains     the 
> necessary contents. There are a couple of wording issues that are already 
> present in the current version that we should address while we're at it (but 
> that is mainly CWG/OWG turf) but nothing major.
> 
> I do have a couple of issues with the icon though. First while I'm sure we 
> would like to take credit for everything OSMish, doesn't "by OSM" imply the 
> wrong thing? What we want to say is I suspect "Data by OSM", that naturally 
> would be rather unwiedly. Further there may be a potential (legal) issue with 
> using OSM in that way that I need to discuss with counsel.
> 
> But all in all a nice step forward.
> 
> Simon
> 
> 
> Am 22.04.2013 14:40, schrieb Alex Barth:
>> Hello everyone -
>> 
>> I'd love to start pushing again on the OSM attribution mark.
>> 
>> This is an updated proposal based on an initial RFC from earlier this year 
>> titled "Contributor Mark" [1, 2]. Sorry for the delay in following up with 
>> adjustments based on feedback           on the original thread. 
>> 
>> Again, the goal of this proposal is to draw more attention to OpenStreetMap 
>> wherever it's used by introducing a visually compelling, linked symbol for 
>> placement on OSM-based works and by explaining OpenStreetMap better at the 
>> place where this symbol links to.
>> 
>> Looking forward to your feedback. I'll also be reaching out to corresponding 
>> working groups and OSMF to see how we can move this forward.
>> 
>> Concretely, this RFC proposes
>> 
>> 1. Replace current credit "© OpenStreetMap Contributors" with a visual mark 
>> where possible
>> 2. Update `openstreetmap.org/copyright` to explain better OSM, to invite 
>> visitors to join and to allow creators of derivative work to link back to 
>> their sites.
>> 
>> The update to the original RFC brings 4 key changes:  
>> 
>> 1. Rename the proposal from 'Contributor Mark' to 'Attribution Mark'
>> 2. A completely redesigned mark, containing the letters "OSM"
>> 3. A completely redesigned `/copyright` page, the page the mark links to. It 
>> is much closer to today's `/copyright`
>> 4. The mark is an alternative to "© OpenStreetMap Contributors". Only where 
>> the mark can't be used, "© OpenStreetMap Contributors" may be used.
>> 
>> Please read up on all details on the newly created RFC page:
>> 
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RFC_Attribution_Mark
>> 
>> Also take a look at the repository containing artwork and code:
>> 
>> https://github.com/osmlab/attribution-mark
>> 
>> Alex
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> [1] Initial RFC 
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2013-January/065784.html  
>> [2] Feedback summary 
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2013-January/065860.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to