I have to admit I filled the thing in - I assumed the middle questions were perhaps psychology related (psychology of OSM users, etc). It never asks for name, email address, phone, place of work etc, town etc. - just age.
Didn't really strike me as phishing. What do people think about this - I'll delete my cookies etc "just in case" it is phishing and run an antivirus scan but does anyone recommend doing anything else? Thanks, Nick -----"Jaakko Helleranta.com" <jaa...@helleranta.com> wrote: ----- To: Clifford Snow <cliff...@snowandsnow.us> From: "Jaakko Helleranta.com" <jaa...@helleranta.com> Date: 19/08/2014 09:38PM Cc: Talk Openstreetmap <talk@openstreetmap.org>, cdimo...@mail.sdsu.edu Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] online survey about the OSM community I too found the questions in the middle of the survey a bit odd. .. To the extent that I needed to re-read the email about the study + the Research page of the wiki to evaluate if this was a valid research of just an odd phishing attempt. And while I ended up trusting that this is a legit request I am copying this to cdimo...@mail.sdsu.edu (try to) ensure that this is actually the case. My last question (=feedback request) included thoughts that when researching OSM it would be a good idea to include the research plan (and I'd add that a link to some actual web page where hopefully there is a notion about the research in question). Specifically it would be highly appreciated if possible attachments e.g. to financing entities (related business(es) I would assume primarily) could be listed. .. Or it would be noted that such information can not be released. Additionally it would be great if the research would be open in nature including at least some level of openness in the data (responses). That is, more than the traditional openness of the analysis. This said, I hope I wasn't fooled into giving out information about myself that is actually easily identifiable. .. And if I was fooled than the lesson is on me. If -- as I assume (and hope) -- this is a valid research then I look forward to reading the results. And hopefully seeing some of the collected data openly available. Should we have a Code of Ethics for researching the OSM community? -Jaakko -- jaa...@helleranta.com * Skype: jhelleranta * Mobile: +505-8845-3391 (Nicaragua) * Voice(mail) / SMS / What's app: +1-202-730-9778 * http://about.me/jaakkoh On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Clifford Snow <cliff...@snowandsnow.us> wrote: I had the same issue. It stopped being about OSM. Which made me suspect that his intent was other than what was announced. I'd be willing to help the OP if he was agreeable to suggestions. Clifford Typos by tablrt On Aug 19, 2014 11:15 AM, "Lester Caine" <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: On 19/08/14 17:47, OSMR wrote: > Thank you in advance for your potential participation and apologies for > the lengthy message in case you are not interested. I gave up before I got half way - just seems like a load of useless crap? Anybody actually managed the whole thing? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
