I don't see any objection to do as Rainer suggested. Maybe someone can give us examples of conflict with any other data ?
All the best *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux <http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux> 2015-01-03 17:50 GMT+01:00 Rainer Fügenstein <r...@oudeis.org>: > > in accordance to the mechanical edit policy, I'd like to open the > discussion on this list: > > a recently approved proposal introduced new tags for pipelines and > marker [1] and changed an established tag: > > type=* was changed to substance=* > > the main reason for this change was a (possible) conflict with type=* > as used in relations. also, type=* was considered to be too generic to > describe the medium flowing within pipelines. > > this requires a mechanical update of existing data: > > nodes: containing pipeline=marker > nodes: containing pipeline=substation > type=* --> substance=* > > ways: for man_made=pipeline > ways: containing pipeline=substation > type=* --> substance=* > > As of now, I'm only aware of the ITO pipeline map (rendering), that is > affected by this change. > > this affects data worldwide. I assume that this update will have to be > executed several times in the near future, as mappers may continue to > use type=* until they are aware of the new pipeline tagging scheme. > > cu > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
