+1 with Mike, there is nothing wrong with voting. As Frederik suggested, I'm strongly in favor of software supplying information about tags. The wiki can be understood by humans but not so readable by machines.
We can imagine that draft of presets or renders can be dynamically generated by software provided that a reference would be completed and maintained. *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux <http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux> 2015-01-06 12:56 GMT+01:00 Mike N <[email protected]>: > On 1/6/2015 6:47 AM, Chris Hill wrote: > >> If the new scheme is adopted in staged way that would be better than a >> single mass edit, though it can still break data use for people who >> don't follow OSM's mailing lists. >> >> I don't blame the proposer of the scheme; he's just following the daft >> guidelines in the wiki. He probably hasn't realised what a phoney, >> broken procedure voting is. >> >> Let's stop using voting. >> > > There's nothing wrong with voting - there just needs to be a well > defined way to stage changes so that consumers are informed and can adapt > to them as they come in. > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
