Hi, (full-quoting as an exception here)
Just to be clear, the core of my idea was some kind of subscription mechanism where you, as a data user, could say: "I am processing these tags in my application and I wish to be notified of important changes". I wasn't even thinking about the input side of that, just describing the output side. Bye Frederik On 01/09/2015 01:59 PM, François Lacombe wrote: > I think there is a big difference between getting information from > templates (very guided and structured) and completely understand the > whole wiki. > > Such software supplying information about tags would be to get them from > the ValueDescription template and give a link to the wiki page if human > want to read. > > Many osmose tests may be aromatically setup just by reading the feature > restriction or the mandatory tags on a value description. > The same from presets, renders, ... > > > Cheers > > > > *François Lacombe* > > fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com > www.infos-reseaux.com <http://www.infos-reseaux.com> > @InfosReseaux <http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux> > > 2015-01-09 1:35 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > > 2015-01-06 13:34 GMT+01:00 François Lacombe > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > As Frederik suggested, I'm strongly in favor of software > supplying information about tags. > The wiki can be understood by humans but not so readable by > machines. > > > > I am not against software supplying information about tags, but we > shouldn't expect miracles, machines are not only bad at > understanding our wiki, they are generally bad at understanding the > world. > ;-) > > Cheers, > Martin > > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
