Am 18.02.2015 um 14:48 schrieb malenki: > Jochen Topf wrote: > >> Please do not add more (and more difficult cases like lakes on >> islands in lakes on land) to the data, otherwise this process will get >> more brittle than it already is. > > Well, that is a word. > > What do you think of the Great Lakes mapped (partly) both with > coastline and MPs?
-1 We already have problems with the update cycle differences of the coastline and the rest of the map. Would would not gain much and simply move the decision over to the renderer. Dual-Systems are confusing and lead to further divergence. As long as we do not have an area type we just need to use relations. With boundaries we had/have similar problems. Right now, we might have to live with nested relations and either use type=multilinestring [1] or a newly created type=* colliar [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multilinestring
0xE8F56581.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
