On 23/07/15 17:04, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > Lester Caine <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > From a UK point of view there nothing wrong with >> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/52.1106/-2.0754 and certainly >> > that is what is needed for any routing system. > Yes, this part of map is not bad. I am not entirely sure whatever it > will be true after landuse will be mapped. > > Readability of nearby > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/52.2325/-1.5484 is poor, despite > that landuse composition is quite favourable and forest rather not > appearing near trunk roads.
The random use of FARM for large areas is totally inappropriate, and personally I'd remove the bulk of those areas ... or cover the rest of the UK. Using 'farm' for the central farm area makes much more sense and is what is the normal standard south of 'Birmingham Farm' area ;) But all of the heavy detail should be an a separate layer so we can actually see the farms in the farmland areas. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
