W dniu 23.08.2015 0:51, Paul Norman napisał(a):
On 8/22/2015 4:20 AM, Daniel Koć wrote:
Could anybody with technical background in the inner OSM workings tell us what is holding us back with introducing new styles (be it raster styles, additional/interactive layers or even vector tiles)?

Only a lack of people willing to do the work.

I would like to know more specific - is there a place I could get more information on the styles we already show? Like where are they hosted (by whom), is there a way to get involved and the things like that. Most of this can be found here:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_tiles

but not whether the servers are internal or external and I don't know if these informations are current.

I believe default osm-carto is hosted on OSM servers?

For me it's important for OSM community to have control over the style, so just adding some nice tiles from the "outer space" will not resolve our problems.

That's why I've asked about possible lack of technical resources - if we have enough horsepower on our servers to run the whole second style it would be great, but I guess you meant just plugging external tiles, which could be nice, but only to some extent. Am I right?

For new layers which are overlays or in-client vector tile rendered,
there would also probably be a pull request needed to add the
necessary code.

cquest (of French style) just let me know that he is experimenting with vector tiles:

https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1402#issuecomment-132209396

So another layman question arises: given that he (or anybody else for that matter!) succeed with serving such tiles AND is willing to fulfill our criteria - would it mean just some code is needed and we have the way to handle (practically) unlimited styles, or it is not that easy as I wish? =}

--
"The train is always on time / The trick is to be ready to put your bags down" [A. Cohen]

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to