Þann 03.11.2015 12:46, Christoph Hormann reit:
This is a lot of material to review but it is highly recommended to
work
through that before you make specific suggestions for changes because
otherwise you are very likely to frustrate those who participated in
those previous discussions by bringing ideas and arguments that have
been covered in depth previously.
As an active participant in the discussion (mostly advocating for
tertiary to be colored) I have to say that "in depth" doesn't really
describe how the decision was taken regarding tertiary color. The answer
to that was basically "just because".
Some of these changes were purely arbitrary, not based on a deep
scientific study, data crunching or otherwise scientific methods.
Arbitrary changes really need to prove themselves, and so far this one
at least hasn't (expanding width and decoloring tertiary).
--Jói / Stalfur
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
