On Tuesday 03 November 2015, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote: > > > > That is not correct, Mateusz put quite some time into trying > > different alternatives for tertiary roads and there was plenty of > > opportunity for all interested parties to participate in discussion > > with suggestions and arguments. You might disagree with the > > outcome but in this particular point you can hardly say it was not > > covered in depth. > > Several alternatives were proposed. They were disregarded without an > exact reason other than "doesn't work for me". >
Also not correct, various alternatives were tested, samples were shown, areas where problems occur were mentioned, advantages and disadvantages of various options mentioned, you can hardly cover this more in depth than this. Note ultimately design decisions are always subjective. If at the end of a long process a decision is made without once more listing in depth all arguments for and against it this does not mean the decision is arbitrary. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
