On 03/11/15 14:39, Christoph Hormann wrote: > Note ultimately design decisions are always subjective. If at the end > of a long process a decision is made without once more listing in depth > all arguments for and against it this does not mean the decision is > arbitrary.
A 'long process' carried out in a small area of discussion is proving problematic for the wider user base. This is one area that once exposed *IS* proving to be the wrong subjective decision followed closely by the changes to road width. The world is a large area with a large range of data spread, so trials may well have missed numerous examples of where something that looks good for a few limited examples fails in the wider coverage. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
