On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 04:33:57 -0600 Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Mateusz Konieczny > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:36:28 -0500 > > Andrew Guertin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > So the question is, should uses of highway=residential_link be > > > edited away, should they be left as-is (unless a different > > > highway type is clearly better), or should the tag be approved > > > and documented? > > > > Can somebody give examples of locations where residential_link makes > > sense? > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262287021 > > No frontage, only exists to tie four ways together around a tree in a > non-roundabout fashion. Only the highway=residential ways are signed > on the ground. I am on a different continent, so I may only StreetView - but I would tag something like that as highway=residential and I see no gain whatsoever from using residential_link. https://www.google.pl/maps/@36.1243396,-95.9812983,3a,75y,163.91h,76.29t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1shsZ4_4xjBRqp_xFsxqtTwg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
