Am 07.11.2017 um 07:29 schrieb Yuri Astrakhan: > The tool has been thoroughly reworked, thanks to many good suggestions. > Please keep discussion to constructive suggestions and ideas - they help > us all move forward and reach agreement. > > What's new: > * Added "reject" vote button > * Tasks can now offer multiple choices selection (thanks Tobias for the > idea) > * Added voting - experimental tasks require two users agreement to change DB
I assumed this to be a mandatory part of the new process. However, some recent edits made by a "Serbian OSM Lint bot" [1] via your tool indicates that you can skip pretty much all of those safeguards, and still be able to run mass updates without any kind of voting, two user agreement, etc. Not sure, if this is intentional, or a bug. > * Users can "unvote" their own votes > * Multiple changes per changeset > * All votes are stored in the same RDF db, so the task can query it too. > * Made it simple to revert Sophox changes: changesets now contain > "task_id" to track task-related edits. Also, this seems to be optional: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53753685 has task_id = "undefined" and was editing via Sophox 0.5. Isn't this case handled in your tool to forbid creating such changesets in the first place? [1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Serbian%20OSM%20Lint%20bot _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
