Hello Martin,
Yes, that sounds a good idea. So (and asking everyone) if I was to license the panos themselves under CC-SA, but their locations, and data derived from them, as ODBL - does that sound acceptable? Thanks, Nick ________________________________ From: Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> Sent: 01 June 2019 08:25 To: Nick Whitelegg Cc: Kathleen Lu; Milo van der Linden; OSM Talk Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for hikers sent from a phone On 31. May 2019, at 22:13, Nick Whitelegg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hello Kathleen and Milo, Thanks! No-one besides myself has uploaded anything yet, so happy to change to ODbL. The panoramas are a different dataset to OSM however, now I think about it, it could well be they are a 'derived work' as the OSM map helps users to position them - so fine with the license change. maybe you can make use of 2 licenses, cc-by-sa for the images/panoramas and odbl for data derived from these images? ODbL is a db license and isn’t very suitable for individual photographs? Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
