Hi,

All I really want is to ensure the panos as individual entities (i.e. not as 
part of another piece of work) must be attributed (to "OTV360 contributors") 
and must be available as individual entities under the same  permissive license 
as originally provided.


I am not so bothered if people then use them as part of some other piece of 
work which is commercial  (such as a video with a narration, as you suggested) 
- as long as they are attributed.


Would ODBL be the best license in this case? Or CC-by-SA?


Thanks,

Nick

________________________________
From: Kathleen Lu <[email protected]>
Sent: 03 June 2019 18:03:50
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: Martin Koppenhoefer; Milo van der Linden; OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for 
hikers

So to confirm what you want...
If someone wanted to use the panos in a video, stitched together with photos 
they took and narration about a hike, that video must be CC-BY-SA or the panos 
cannot be used, is that right?



On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 4:58 AM Nick Whitelegg 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Hello Martin,


Yes, that sounds a good idea.


So (and asking everyone) if I was to license the panos themselves under CC-SA,  
but their locations, and data derived from them, as ODBL - does that sound 
acceptable?


Thanks,

Nick




________________________________
From: Martin Koppenhoefer 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: 01 June 2019 08:25
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: Kathleen Lu; Milo van der Linden; OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for 
hikers



sent from a phone

On 31. May 2019, at 22:13, Nick Whitelegg 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Hello Kathleen and Milo,

Thanks!


No-one besides myself has uploaded anything yet, so happy to change to ODbL. 
The panoramas are a different dataset to OSM however, now I think about it, it 
could well be they are a 'derived work' as the OSM map helps users to position 
them - so fine with the license change.


maybe you can make use of 2 licenses, cc-by-sa for the images/panoramas and 
odbl for data derived from these images? ODbL is a db license and isn’t very 
suitable for individual photographs?

Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to