here's another lovely example from BBC TWO using Strava (i can spot the Mapbox logo, not the reasonable calculated ©OpenStreetMap contributors). glad BBC attributed Google properly. they probably aren't aware it's OpenStreetMap, if they can't read the attribution on Strava https://www.facebook.com/413132078795966/posts/2468472903261863/
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, 18:59 Nuno Caldeira, <nunocapelocalde...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, 18:05 Simon Poole, <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > >> The fair use point just turned up to illustrate that there are limits on >> what we can expect copyright to do for us (aka the tweets from private >> individuals showing a map excerpt that Nuno pointed to) and there is no >> point in getting upset over that there are such limitations. >> > actually Simon those prints indivuals share on social media is sent to > their emails by the company (as someone pointed after you writing). Strava > sends emails of OSM basemap to their users without attribution. > I been testing Strava app today and had a couple of laughts TB. tYhere's > even more interesting stuff we should take notice when doing the > attribution guidance. they use Google maps on their android app, the routes > they display clearly isn't from their users (it's not GPS traces as it is > impossible to have no overlaping traces on mountain regions). I'm sure > these routes are from OSM and I'm gathering evidence from my contributions > that this is OSM data. I will get back to it when I get home and record a > video with clear evidence that it is impossible to be their users GPS trace > or Google Maps (as they do not have data in that regions). That could only > come from OSM and I'm sure as I added that data and weekly monitor the > editing and their suggested routes sometimes overlap the same route as it > displayed different versions of OSM data during the years. > >>
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
