@Rihards Thanks. I will try to do that documentation over the holidays.
@Phil Wyatt don't get me wrong, but adding something there is useless. i
added Facebook there over one year ago. They don't have shame, no point
to add companies there, when there's sites and companies that been there
for years without real consequence. It's just a wiki page that most
won't ever acknowledge.
As an xmas bonus, here's another Facebook company (via Mapbox), Snapchat
that is using OSM without attribution requirements (funnily there's
plenty of space for a reasonable and visible calculated mapbox logo and
text). They probably don't know, nor that they have been asked to comply
over a year ago, nor have agreed with the license in every aspect of it
when stated using OSM data, nor read Mapbox TOS, or Mapbox been informed
on these repeated offenders, nor read the multiples reports in mailing
lists, nor that they had a employee that ran for OSMF board.
https://map.snapchat.com/
Let's continue to be hypocrites and pretend nothing is going on for over
a year with these two companies that are corporate members of OSMF and
should be the first ones to give examples. Enough with excuses.
Happy holidays.
Às 09:34 de 20/12/2019, Rihards escreveu:
On 20.12.19 09:42, Nuno Caldeira wrote:
hi Pierre,
I have tried that route multiple times in twitter, they will ignore. as
they ignore emails (even if you CC [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>), the license, the mailing list.
if you can read the attribution clearly here let me
know https://twitter.com/iamnunocaldeira/status/1207927051669397504?s=19
this is not manipulated or cropped, straight out of the app.
Nuno, thank you for documenting the attribution concerns.
It is understandable that repeated problems are frustrating. We as OSM
contributors see so many of them, and by the hundredth case we perceive
them as repeat offenders.
I try to remind myself that absolute majority do not do this on purpose,
and that my perception should not connect a new case to all the previous
ones. It is harder than it might sound :)
Without diving into specifics of each case, it still seems important to
have clear documentation on major cases.
Have you had a chance to put together a dedicated wiki page about Facebook?
It has been repeated in email threads many times, but if a student came
around and wanted to put together a research about attribution,
copyright and whatnot - would they have an easy time getting a complete
picture of Facebook attitude towards OSM attribution?
It would be crucial for that page to be neutral and avoid accusations,
even when Occam's razor seems huge and shiny - pure facts would fit
there best.
On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, 00:14 Pierre Béland, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Nuno,
How can we react positively suggesting to take care obout OSM
attribution ? This is an international media and we can benefit by
having a bit of fun.
Plus this is Christmas coming soon and we need to think positive !
You could make tweet to https://twitter.com/BBCTwo + using
OpenStreetMap logo image (add @OpenStreetMap as who is on the image)
+ url link to facebook article
saying
/Merry Christmas from the OpenStreetMap community Happy to /provide
accurate and detailed maps/ to news medias, governnments, research,
business, consumers, to respond to disasters, etc. Dont forget -
Our New Year Best Wishes to have more impact - OpenStreetMap
Contributors attribution :)/
/
/
Then you could invite OSM contributors on the discussion lists to
make it Viral by responding !
To show OSM diversity, I would be pleased to respond to the tweet.
/Bonne année, Pierre Béland, du Québec, Canada, fier de supporter
OpenStreetMap.
/
;)
Pierre
Le jeudi 19 décembre 2019 18 h 16 min 44 s UTC−5, Nuno Caldeira
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
a écrit :
here's another lovely example from BBC TWO using Strava (i can spot
the Mapbox logo, not the reasonable calculated ©OpenStreetMap
contributors). glad BBC attributed Google properly. they probably
aren't aware it's OpenStreetMap, if they can't read the attribution
on Strava
https://www.facebook.com/413132078795966/posts/2468472903261863/
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, 18:59 Nuno Caldeira,
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, 18:05 Simon Poole, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The fair use point just turned up to illustrate that there
are limits on what we can expect copyright to do for us (aka
the tweets from private individuals showing a map excerpt
that Nuno pointed to) and there is no point in getting upset
over that there are such limitations.
actually Simon those prints indivuals share on social media is
sent to their emails by the company (as someone pointed after
you writing). Strava sends emails of OSM basemap to their users
without attribution.
I been testing Strava app today and had a couple of laughts TB.
tYhere's even more interesting stuff we should take notice when
doing the attribution guidance. they use Google maps on their
android app, the routes they display clearly isn't from their
users (it's not GPS traces as it is impossible to have no
overlaping traces on mountain regions). I'm sure these routes
are from OSM and I'm gathering evidence from my contributions
that this is OSM data. I will get back to it when I get home and
record a video with clear evidence that it is impossible to be
their users GPS trace or Google Maps (as they do not have data
in that regions). That could only come from OSM and I'm sure as
I added that data and weekly monitor the editing and their
suggested routes sometimes overlap the same route as it
displayed different versions of OSM data during the years. --
Rihards
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
