Hi, Mario.

Yes, something like that.

I think it is appropriate to keep the discussion in terms of
legitimate/abusive, authorized/unauthorized, etc., and to avoid talking
about offenses or feelings. (That's another evil path that I've also had the
misfortune to suffer)

If the OSMF considers it legitimate and authorizes the use of its trademarks
to create logos along with emblems of certain organizations or political
movements, there is nothing more to say. Being their brands, they decide.

Transferring the decision to the members of the Foundation avoids us having
to keep ideological discussions about political or social movements that, in
principle, are not directly related to what we do here.


Greetings from Spain.

Regards,
Daniel

P.S.: If anyone is looking for very controversial discussions related to
what we do here, please visit the Tagging list :D



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to