On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:39:11AM +0200, Colin Smale wrote: > > Legally this is broken. Legally you may not enter the zone when > > your destination is not within that zone and there nothing like a > > distance based penalty within that area. > > > > So yes - there is a problem - But not within tagging. Its something > > routers need to solve. > > Routers cannot work alone, they have to work together with the tagging. > It's not fair to claim it's all their problem. If the tagging does not > represent the nuances required, the router should not be expected to > just guess (at least where the difference is between legal and illegal).
Dont get me wrong - If there is information missing to distinguish
cases i am happy to find new tags/ways to describe them.
For a destination case routers need to take that step.
If there is a grid of roads all connect each other and all of them are
destination its basically a subgraph which you pay a penalty to enter.
Its not a "per distance" penalty which it is currently for the ones
i am using/testing regularly.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
