Now, we don't want to make the same mistake as Sun did with Generics; how do we reach concensus on wether to include or strip out default-binding? Another vote?
I tending towards leaving it as is, but there are some good ideas on how to processed if we strip default-binding out. For example, changing the various link components to take a "onclick" parameter (as a rename of "listener"), i.e. <a listener="listener:doClick">...</a> vs. <a onclick="listener:doClick"> ... </a> The lack of repetition in the second example is desirable. I'm also tending towards default of literal: in a template, default of ognl: in XML. But there's that consistency issue again; perhaps is should be literal: everywhere for best efficiency? -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
