+1
On Jul 26, 2005, at 5:42 PM, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
I like it the way it is - defaults to literal in templates and ognl in
specs. I am with Geoff on the rename - I think its going to be a pain
during template development when you have an onclick just for testing
out the template.
-Harish
On 7/26/05, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now, we don't want to make the same mistake as Sun did with Generics;
how do we reach concensus on wether to include or strip out
default-binding? Another vote?
I tending towards leaving it as is, but there are some good ideas on
how to processed if we strip default-binding out.
For example, changing the various link components to take a "onclick"
parameter (as a rename of "listener"), i.e.
<a listener="listener:doClick">...</a>
vs.
<a onclick="listener:doClick"> ... </a>
The lack of repetition in the second example is desirable.
I'm also tending towards default of literal: in a template,
default of
ognl: in XML. But there's that consistency issue again; perhaps is
should be literal: everywhere for best efficiency?
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work. http://howardlewisship.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
