I think 4.0 final without a compatible Spindle is absurd in this modern web application development era. I therefore don't think 4.0 should go out of the door before bug TAPESTRY-724 is resolved. This is a protest vote and I hope others would join.
+0 (non-binding) Francis On 12/1/05, Brian K. Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > > By the time this vote ends, we'll have some kind of fix for > > TAPESTRY-724. I think, with that, Tapestry 4.0 is ready for prime > > time. We've already had the discussion of outstanding bugs needing > > fixing. I think we should get 4.0 out the door. > > > > Howard M. Lewis Ship: +1 (binding) > > > > -- > > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > > Creator, Jakarta Tapestry > > Creator, Jakarta HiveMind > > > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > While I'm more than anxious to see 4.0 released... > > Considering what's riding on this issue (Spindle being a major > contributor to easing Tapestry development), I'd rather hold off any > vote until the "some kind of fix" works for tooling. Not saying it > wouldn't, but I don't see how holding off the vote until then would hurt. > > - -0 (non-binding) until then > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) > > iD8DBQFDjm+saCoPKRow/gARAsSYAKCCj50ePxiKfcEH1lY/39acwCvw7gCfZ3Qz > 8Cv3ufif91dCQI0dQJ7ijU4= > =dGLD > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
