Really what I'm wanting to do can probably be address by just using
something like Commons Digester. But maybe using a framework like
Hivemind I could better organize my logic. Again, as you can tell I'm
just not understanding all the pieces.

Jamie Orchard-Hays wrote:

> The questions are, "What problems are you trying to solve?" "Which
> frameworks help you solve them best: Spring, Hivemind, none?" In other
> words, you must have a need, a problem to solve that requires a
> framework like Hivemind.
>
> Tapestry Picasso uses Hivemind to give it greater flexibility,
> extensibility, configurability. You can pretty much ignore it for
> basic Tapestry tasks.
>
> There have been some threads over the past few days about using Spring
> for DB stuff, which (from what I read, not personal experience)
> integrates well with Tapestry and Hivemind.
>
> Jamie
>
> On May 11, 2005, at 5:47 PM, Stanczak Group wrote:
>
>> I've been looking at Hivemind, Spring, etc, trying to understand things.
>> So what I've came up with thus far is since I'm starting out fresh and
>> am already using Tapestry, I would probably be wise to use Hivemind. Is
>> this correct? Then I see Tapestry is being built on Hivemind, so that
>> makes me think it's a better choice. Now I'm trying to understand the
>> combo of Tapestry and Hivemind. I'm guessing you still use Hivemind
>> separate from Tapestry, and Tapestry is using Hivemind for it's own
>> uses. But my question is will the addition of Hivemind to Tapestry add
>> the features I'm looking for to Tapestry and I won't need Hivemind, or
>> would I still be smart to go ahead and use Hivemind to help me better
>> develop my software? Maybe I'm way off here. I think I understand the
>> use of Hivemind, but I'm looking into the future and wondering what
>> direction I should follow. If my questions don't make sense then I'm
>> probably not understanding the use of Hivemind. Can someone direct me?
>>
>> -- 
>> Justin Stanczak
>> Stanczak Group
>> 812-735-3600
>>
>> "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
>> nothing."
>> Edmund Burke
>>
>> ..________...............__.................
>> ./  _____/..____..._____/..|_..____...____....
>> /...\..____/.__.\./....\...__\/.._.\./._..\....
>> \....\_\..\..___/|...|..\..|.(..<_>.|.<_>..)....
>> .\______../\___.._\__|../__|..\____/.\____/......
>> ........\/.....\/.....\/..........................
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-- 
Justin Stanczak
Stanczak Group
812-735-3600

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke

..________...............__.................
./  _____/..____..._____/..|_..____...____....
/...\..____/.__.\./....\...__\/.._.\./._..\....
\....\_\..\..___/|...|..\..|.(..<_>.|.<_>..)....
.\______../\___.._\__|../__|..\____/.\____/......
........\/.....\/.....\/..........................


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to