Sorry, I was referring to myself as being the lurker, not you Juan. SourceForge is where a large % are maintained for Struts.
Christopher Marsh-Bourdon www.marsh-bourdon.com -----Original Message----- From: Juan Esteban Maya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 July 2005 16:13 To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: About a bigger Tapestry components library! Yes...I can be a lurker..Unfortunately my Tapestry knowledge is not yet the best. I still trying to build some custom components, but im still learning while a build them. So start a project in the middle of the learning curve is not a very wise Idea. It could even hurt Tapestry.! (and my ego! :-) So...the intention of the email is just that. Question people like me..and start a new project... On 7/5/05, Marsh-Bourdon, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a lurker with one only miss-directed post (apols), if you want this > additional functionality, why not start a sub-project yourself? > > As a bit of a Struts die-hard (I'm making my way through Tapestry in > Action at the moment though), this kind of development happens a lot with Struts. > Sometimes it is then included in the Struts deployment, sometimes it > is kept separate. > > If you want it that bad and you want Tapestry to go from strength to > strength, then why not give a little OS time? > > Christopher Marsh-Bourdon > www.marsh-bourdon.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lennart Benoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 July 2005 16:09 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: About a bigger Tapestry components library! > > > I totaly agree. > Personaly, if i had to make a technology choice now without knowing > tapestry i would probaly go for JSF in favor of tapestry. One of the > main reasons would indeed be the lack of immediatly available and easy > to use advanced and nicely packaged components. > I have the impression that a lot of effort is put into the technical > aspacts of tapestry ( e.g. tapestry 4) but way too few in the > packaging and presentation. > As a matter of fact in my opinion tapestry will have to move fast or > it will become some sort of Macintosh for web developers. Used by a > small elite of die hards. > > Do not misunderstand! i absolutly love tapestry, it has potential and > i hope for a bright future. We should be aware of stiff competition tough. > > Kind regards, > Lennart > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Juan Esteban Maya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: 07/05/05 - 09:40 > >To: Juan Esteban Maya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: RE: About a bigger Tapestry components library! > > > >I have been working with tapestry for almost 3-4 months and its > >really nice. The development process and the productivity incressed a lot. > >But what i really miss (well i wish) is to have a big and robust > >component library. > > > >This has been already discussed in the mailing list, but i guess it > >deserves more attention. JSF, which i think is the biggest Tapestry > >competitor has already a lot of Subprojects, componentes libraries, > >even comercial ones(Well, yes is sun i know!) and i havent seen a new > >tapestry Components in a while. I think this issue is fundamental to > >new tapestry users. If i have to choose a new component technology > >the first thing that i will look are the components that the > >technology can offers...Tapestry is clearly behind JSF in this aspect. > > > >Any thoughts about how can we, Tapestry users, have big component > >library? Not just a repository. > > > >Juan > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------ > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- The information contained herein is confidential and is > intended solely for the addressee. Access by any other party is > unauthorised without the express written permission of the sender. If > you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender either > via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20 7623 8000, or via e-mail > return. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our > e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to > http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. 3166 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "The passion for destruction is also a creative passion!" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20 7623 8000, or via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. 3166 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
