As a matter of fact i already took a step in that direction with a project called EWAD (see sourceforge): "The mission of Ewad is to provide an out-of-the-box, fully-featured application development environment for the open-source java / web developer. After running the installation script you have a ready to use development environment featuring: Eclipse, Mysql, Database authoring, Tomcat, Jetty, Tapestry, Spindle, Palette and others. No configuration at all! "
+ my ClipBoard component is currently being brewed and almost ready for release in Tassel. If they want it! But on the other hand: you should not throw this argument when someone complains about the lack of components. I complain, other just choose an alternative eg .net. The components should be there, this one of the major responsibilities of a web application development framework selling itself as being component oriented. Kind regards >-----Original Message----- >From: "Tapestry users" <[email protected]> >Sent: 07/05/05 - 10:05 >To: "Tapestry users" <[email protected]> >Subject: RE: RE: About a bigger Tapestry components library! > >As a lurker with one only miss-directed post (apols), if you want this >additional functionality, why not start a sub-project yourself? > >As a bit of a Struts die-hard (I'm making my way through Tapestry >in Action >at the moment though), this kind of development happens a lot with >Struts. >Sometimes it is then included in the Struts deployment, sometimes it is >kept >separate. > >If you want it that bad and you want Tapestry to go from strength to >strength, then why not give a little OS time? > >Christopher Marsh-Bourdon >www.marsh-bourdon.com > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Lennart Benoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 05 July 2005 16:09 >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: About a bigger Tapestry components library! > > >I totaly agree. >Personaly, if i had to make a technology choice now without knowing >tapestry >i would probaly go for JSF in favor of tapestry. One of the main >reasons >would indeed be the lack of immediatly available and easy to use >advanced >and nicely packaged components. >I have the impression that a lot of effort is put into the technical >aspacts >of tapestry ( e.g. tapestry 4) but way too few in the packaging and >presentation. >As a matter of fact in my opinion tapestry will have to move fast or it >will >become some sort of Macintosh for web developers. Used by a small elite >of >die hards. > >Do not misunderstand! i absolutly love tapestry, it has potential and i >hope >for a bright future. We should be aware of stiff competition tough. > >Kind regards, >Lennart > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Juan Esteban Maya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Sent: 07/05/05 - 09:40 >>To: Juan Esteban Maya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: RE: About a bigger Tapestry components library! >> >>I have been working with tapestry for almost 3-4 months and its >really >>nice. The development process and the productivity incressed a lot. >>But what i really miss (well i wish) is to have a big and robust >>component library. >> >>This has been already discussed in the mailing list, but i guess it > >>deserves more attention. JSF, which i think is the biggest Tapestry > >>competitor has already a lot of Subprojects, componentes libraries, > >>even comercial ones(Well, yes is sun i know!) and i havent seen a >new >>tapestry Components in a while. I think this issue is fundamental >to >>new tapestry users. If i have to choose a new component technology >the >>first thing that i will look are the components that the technology >can >>offers...Tapestry is clearly behind JSF in this aspect. >> >>Any thoughts about how can we, Tapestry users, have big component >>library? Not just a repository. >> >>Juan >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------ > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely >for the >addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the >express >written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended >recipient, please >contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20 7623 >8000, or >via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to >read our >e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to >http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. 3166 >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
