+1
On 6/18/2015 9:44 AM, Michael Welzl wrote:
*My* goal is, and has always been, to provide a simpler, general API
that is protocol independent. Note that this is not only for
simplicity for ease of use BUT also for the sake of being able to
automatize. After all the major goal is to remove the strict binding
between applications and a specific protocol choice.
To be able to do this (documents 2 and 3), we first need a list of
the existing services - our toolbox, if you wish (document 1).
Figuring out what's missing / wrong about today's APIs (except that
they are bound to a specific protocol) has never been*my* major
intention, and I certainly don't see that as the goal of this
document. I'd be surprised if that's what the charter suggests?! But
of course my opinion is only what it is, the charter reflects the
consensus...
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
