On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Joe Touch <to...@isi.edu> wrote: > > You're getting far ahead of the conversation, IMO. This document needs to > start by explaining the services we already have before jumping into a > "service of services" model. > > I don't disagree with the goal, but it's impractical to develop a > meta-interface when the base interface has not been described.
It is just to say that TCP already defines its services, and the goal is not to give another definition of these services, but only to change the way they are exposed to applications. So the services definition already exists, but implicitly. > > > Joe >
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
