Michael, On 6/20/2015 1:35 AM, Michael Welzl wrote:
On 20. jun. 2015, at 00.55, Joe Touch <to...@isi.edu> wrote: On 6/19/2015 3:42 PM, Mohamed Oulmahdi wrote:
...
Let's put it this way: - if the goal of TAPS is to unify existing APIs, then those APIs need to be summarized together in one place - if TAPS is indeed focused solely on an alternate API, then it should NOT try to 'restate' the existing TCP API in a TAPS doc "Do, or do not; there is no try." - YodaTAPS is focused on an alternate API that it's based on existing transports. As a way of analyzing existing transports and creating a foundation for this API, document #1 is written. I think this discussion is about the approach taken to write document #1. So now I wonder what you're complaining about,
I'm trying to get Mohamed (and perhaps others) on the same page as you and I.
Joe _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
