Hi, This draft is in good shape. Some quick comments, that are almost entirely editorial:
1, 2nd paragraph: RTP can also run over DCCP, TLS, and DTLS. 4.1.1: “described further in Section 3.1 below” – but section 3.1 is above in the document. 4.3 (SCTP): “It is therefore deployed in all Web browsers supporting WebRTC” – actually, a slightly restricted subset of SCTP tunnelled over DTLS over UDP is part of WebRTC. 4.6.2: editorial - list formatting is messed up 4.8.1: the correct expansion of RTCP is “RTP control protocol”, not “ Real Time Control Protocol” 4.8.1: “The RFC-series specifies RTP media formats” should be “…RTP payload formats” 4.8.1: “RTP sender and receiver can send RTCP report packets.” – actually, “…will send…” 4.8.2: “multicast, anycast or IPv4 broadcast” – not sure broadcast makes sense, and isn’t anycast just a variation on unicast? (i.e., RTP is no more anycast than is TCP) 5: RTP is not mentioned in the bullet lists of transport service features - should it be? 8: my name is mis-spelt in the bullet on section 4.8 Colin > On 29 Dec 2015, at 17:22, Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Reminder: WGLC on this doc ends this week. Please read the current rev and > send comments -- pro or con -- to this list. > > --aaron > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Aaron Falk <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > This email announces a TAPS Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on: > > Services provided by IETF transport protocols and congestion control > mechanisms > draft-ietf-taps-transports-08.txt > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-transports/> > > Due to the timing (many people take time off during the December holidays), > this WGLC will run for slightly longer than usual - it will be for just over > 3 weeks, ending at midnight US Eastern (daylight) Time on Thursday, December > 31st. Comments should be sent to the [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > list, although purely editorial comments may be sent directly to the authors > ([email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>). > > We're looking for at least a couple more reviews during WGLC - please email > the chair ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>) if you're > interested and willing to review this draft (otherwise, we'll have to go > "beat the bushes" for reviewers). > > Thanks, > > --aaron > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps -- Colin Perkins https://csperkins.org/
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
