I think these should be incorporated, thanks Colin, we'll prepare an update.
Gorry P.S. Sorry your name was misspelt. > Hi, > > This draft is in good shape. Some quick comments, that are almost entirely > editorial: > > 1, 2nd paragraph: RTP can also run over DCCP, TLS, and DTLS. > > 4.1.1: âdescribed further in Section 3.1 belowâ â but section 3.1 is > above in the document. > > 4.3 (SCTP): âIt is therefore deployed in all Web browsers supporting > WebRTCâ â actually, a slightly restricted subset of SCTP tunnelled > over DTLS over UDP is part of WebRTC. > > 4.6.2: editorial - list formatting is messed up > > 4.8.1: the correct expansion of RTCP is âRTP control protocolâ, not > â Real Time Control Protocolâ > > 4.8.1: âThe RFC-series specifies RTP media formatsâ should be > ââ¦RTP payload formatsâ > > 4.8.1: âRTP sender and receiver can send RTCP report packets.â â > actually, ââ¦will sendâ¦â > > 4.8.2: âmulticast, anycast or IPv4 broadcastâ â not sure broadcast > makes sense, and isnât anycast just a variation on unicast? (i.e., RTP > is no more anycast than is TCP) > > 5: RTP is not mentioned in the bullet lists of transport service features > - should it be? > > 8: my name is mis-spelt in the bullet on section 4.8 > > Colin > > > > >> On 29 Dec 2015, at 17:22, Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Reminder: WGLC on this doc ends this week. Please read the current rev >> and send comments -- pro or con -- to this list. >> >> --aaron >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Aaron Falk <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> This email announces a TAPS Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on: >> >> Services provided by IETF transport protocols and congestion >> control mechanisms >> draft-ietf-taps-transports-08.txt >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-transports/> >> >> Due to the timing (many people take time off during the December >> holidays), this WGLC will run for slightly longer than usual - it will >> be for just over 3 weeks, ending at midnight US Eastern (daylight) Time >> on Thursday, December 31st. Comments should be sent to the >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> list, although purely editorial >> comments may be sent directly to the authors >> ([email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>). >> >> We're looking for at least a couple more reviews during WGLC - please >> email the chair ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>) if >> you're interested and willing to review this draft (otherwise, we'll >> have to go "beat the bushes" for reviewers). >> >> Thanks, >> >> --aaron >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Taps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps > > > > -- > Colin Perkins > https://csperkins.org/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps > _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
