Hi Aaron, We have a draft we’ll be publishing in the next week that does a survey of Transport Security protocols, and the interfaces they expose to the transport layer as well as applications. We’d like to have a slot to discuss this topic with the WG.
Thanks, Tommy > On Jun 27, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here the short list of topics recently raised for our next meeting and some > questions/comments. Please respond and suggest any other topics. > > draft-gjessing-taps-minset-05.txt > > There’s been some interesting discussion on the draft. Are there any specific > topics we should set aside time to discuss? > Socket Intents > > Again, what specific topics should we discuss? > We’ve been told to expect 3 drafts: on general concepts, BSD implementation, > & communication granularity. What’s worth discussing? > Michio Honda HotNets paper “PASTE: Network Stacks Must Integrate with NVMM > Abstractions > <http://www.ht.sfc.keio.ac.jp/%7Emicchie/papers/paste-hotnets16.pdf>” > > “These days I'm working on networking interface for non-volatile main memory > (a.k.a. persistent memory and storage-class memory), because with such > devices networking stack/API becomes a bottleneck in the end-to-end > communication that involves persistent media (disk or SSDs for now). I saw > some post-socket discussion in the minutes of the last meeting, so I wonder > if this type of work could give some useful information to IETFers who design > new transport API standards.” > Is there interest in this topic? AFAIK, there’s no Internet Draft. I will > inquire whether Michio intends to submit one. > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
