+1. Cheers,
Brian > On 18 Jul 2017, at 12:02, Michael Welzl <[email protected]> wrote: > > Agree 100% - I think this proposal is exactly the right way to do it. > > Cheers, > Michael > > >> On Jul 18, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Kyle Rose <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Proposal: >> >> (1) Strike the last paragraph of the charter ("TAPS is not chartered to >> perform detailed analysis..."). >> >> (2) Change the third bullet right above it to read "Extension, modification, >> or creation of transport or security protocols" >> >> The idea being to permit analysis of the properties of security protocols >> with respect to the requirements of TAPS systems, but not to permit creation >> or customization of security protocols. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Kyle >> _______________________________________________ >> Taps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
