I just joined this list.
I can work with this.
Bob
On 07/18/2017 01:36 PM, Tommy Pauly wrote:
Agreed. Thanks for the text proposal, Kyle!
Tommy
On Jul 18, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Brian Trammell (IETF) <[email protected]> wrote:
+1.
Cheers,
Brian
On 18 Jul 2017, at 12:02, Michael Welzl <[email protected]> wrote:
Agree 100% - I think this proposal is exactly the right way to do it.
Cheers,
Michael
On Jul 18, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Kyle Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
Proposal:
(1) Strike the last paragraph of the charter ("TAPS is not chartered to perform
detailed analysis...").
(2) Change the third bullet right above it to read "Extension, modification, or
creation of transport or security protocols"
The idea being to permit analysis of the properties of security protocols with
respect to the requirements of TAPS systems, but not to permit creation or
customization of security protocols.
Thoughts?
Kyle
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
